1. Home
  2. Store
  3. MOTOROLA
  4. Motorola Moto G 5G

Motorola Moto G 5G

Motorola Moto G 5G

Brand: MOTOROLA
Category: Smart Phones
  • Display: 6.7" Inch
  • Camera: 48MP (2160p)
  • RAM: 2-6GB RAM
  • Processor: Snapdragon 750G 5G
  • Battery: 5000mAh
  • Launch Date: 2020, December 07
  • Storage: 64GB/128GB storage, microSDXC
  • OS: Android 10
  • Body: 212g, 9.9mm thickness

Specs

Network

Technology GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
2G bands GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43
5G bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
Speed HSPA, LTE, 5G

Launch

Announced 2020, November 05
Status Available. Released 2020, December 07

Body

Dimensions 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 in)
Weight 212 g (7.48 oz)
Build Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame
SIM Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM

Display

Type IPS LCD, HDR10
Size 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio)
Resolution 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density)

Platform

OS Android 10
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570)
GPU Adreno 619

Memory

Card slot microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 2GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM

Main Camera

Primary Camera 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Second Camera 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
Third Camera 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro), AF
Features LED flash, HDR, panorama
Video 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS

Selfie camera

Primary Camera 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm
Features HDR
Video 1080p@30fps

Sound

Loudspeaker Yes
3.5mm jack Yes

Comms

WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Bluetooth 5.1, A2DP, LE
Positioning GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO
NFC Yes
Radio FM radio, RDS
USB USB Type-C 2.0

Features

Sensors Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Battery

Type Li-Po 5000 mAh
Charging 20W wired

Misc

Colors Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver
Price About 90 EUR

Test Results

Performance AnTuTu: 312461 (v8)
GeekBench: 1980 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)
Display 1419:1 contrast ratio, 484 nits max brightness (measured)
Camera Photo / Video
Loudspeaker -28.1 LUFS (Average)
Battery(old) Endurance rating 131h

EU LABEL

Our Rating

The overall rating is based on review by our experts

6.6
  • Design 7 / 10
  • Display 6 / 10
  • Camera 6 / 10
  • Auto Focus 6 / 10
  • Image Quality 6 / 10
  • Performance 6 / 10
  • Features 7 / 10
  • Connectivity 8 / 10
  • Call Quality 7 / 10
  • Multimedia 6 / 10
  • Usability 7 / 10
  • Video Quality 5 / 10
  • Battery 9 / 10

PROS

  1. Extremely affordable price point for a 5G-enabled smartphone.
  2. Stylish, comfortable design with a durable vegan leather back finish.
  3. Long-lasting 5,000mAh battery providing all-day usage.
  4. Smooth display performance thanks to the 120Hz refresh rate.
  5. Includes NFC support for contactless payments, which was missing in previous budget models.
  6. Retains the 3.5mm headphone jack for wired audio convenience.
  7. Features a 50MP main camera that captures decent, social media-ready photos.
  8. Includes expandable storage via a microSD card slot.
  9. Clean software experience with useful, non-intrusive gesture controls.
  10. Good water-repellent design (IP52 rating) protects against light spills or rain.

CONS

  1. Display resolution is only 720p, resulting in lower sharpness compared to competitors.
  2. The screen can feel dim and difficult to read in direct outdoor sunlight.
  3. Performance can feel sluggish or stutter during multitasking or intensive app usage.
  4. Only 4GB of RAM in the base model limits heavy, modern app multitasking.
  5. The 2MP macro camera offers poor, grainy photo output.
  6. The front-facing camera produces soft, noisy images.
  7. Extremely limited software support, promising only one major OS upgrade.
  8. Slow charging speed (18W) takes over 1 hour and 50 minutes to fully charge.
  9. Comes preinstalled with too much unnecessary bloatware and third-party apps.
  10. Lacks the faster, more efficient processor found in slightly more expensive budget alternatives

Reviews

  • Be the first to add a Review

    Please post a user review only if you have / had this product.

  • Rate this Product

  • 5
  • 6
  • 5
  • 8
  • 7
  • 5
  • 5
  • 6
  • 5
  • 6
  • 6
  • 6
  • 6
  • 6 / 10 based on your selection

Disclaimer Note

All specifications are provided as-is and may contain errors; we do our best to keep the information accurate but recommend re-verifying before purchase.

Search

Filter Products

BrandsView All

Show More Brands